Oct 022017

CIWAA is pleased to see that the recommendations of the review panel have addressed some issues of great importance to injured workers. The panel heard from many injured workers and their allies and advocates of the “culture of denial” at the WCB. We are pleased to see that the panel calls for changes to put the needs of the injured worker at the centre. These include: elimination of incentives to close files and declare workers ready to return to work; ending secret arbitrary limits on the treatment workers receive; and ending the practice of returning “surpluses” to employers.

The panel has made a number of recommendations which address the improper use of medical consultants and independent medical examiners by the WCB. The recommendations to uphold the right of injured workers to choose their health care providers and, where an independent medical examination is required, to select the physician from a roster are very positive. We do however raise a concern that the Fair Practices Office, Medical Panel Office and Appeals Commission must function independently. The appointment of a Medical Panel Commissioner must not be subject to political patronage as has been the case in the past. We also support the recommendations to put in place a process for a worker to apply for continued benefits while an appeal is in process, and for continuation of medical benefits by employers.

The recommendations of the panel address the fraudulent deeming practices of the WCB, in particular the way in which WCB declares workers capable of working full-time at a phantom job such as a parking lot attendant or store greeter, irrespective of the workers’ skills, experience, education and physical limitations and the existence and availability of such work. To add insult to injury, WCB then increases the imaginary wage for this phantom job every year until workers are left with a pittance or often no benefits at all.

The recommendations are a good beginning, but in order to protect the rights of injured workers, deeming must be used only when documented evidence exists that a worker has refused a legitimate job offer for appropriate work. The job must be available and suitable for the worker’s skills, education and experience. The WCB must support injured workers in their efforts to obtain real work, recognizing the reluctance of employers to hire injured workers and the real difficulties faced in finding work. The reluctance of employers to hire injured workers must be recognized, and compensation continued until workers have found suitable work. A “deemed” wage must not only be based on verifiable information as proposed by the panel and established annually, not years into the future. All workers now deemed should be able to have their case re-opened including access to appeal.

The following areas are either missing are missing from the report and should be included in new legislation and policy.

1. Justice for Injured Workers now without benefits and often living in extreme poverty. The report details many ways in which workers are unjustly denied benefits, but makes no recommendations for reparations and to address the ongoing injustices.

The panel recognized that the review and appeal process is daunting for injured workers, especially those who do not have a union at their workplace or collective to support them. Injured workers living in poverty may have abandoned their claim, missed a deadline, or failed to assemble the evidence they needed to counter the “medical opinions” of WCB-retained “paper doctors” who never saw or treated them.

Recognition of the failure of the current WCB system to uphold the rights of injured workers requires that injured workers whose claims have been unjustly denied have access to review and appeal. All denied claims of injured workers where the decision was based on the opinion of WCB paid physicians, medical consultants and Medical Panels which contradicted the clinical observation and findings, ongoing direct examinations and supporting medical evidence of treating physicians and/ or health care providers must be reopened on request. As well, if the worker now has evidence or medical opinion which was not previously presented at the time of adjudication, this evidence should be considered and not rejected on strict legal grounds, e.g. time limits or lack of “new evidence.”

3. Claim suppression: Employers must not be permitted to engage in claim suppression with impunity and strong penalties against employers should be in place. All systems which encourage employers to suppress claims must be ended.

4. Non-economic loss payments should reflect the real impact of a disability on a worker’s life outside the workplace. Current payments show how little value is placed on the life of a worker. To provide some examples of how profound changes to a worker’s life are valued: a worker who becomes legally blind in both eyes would be eligible for a NELP of $28,800; complete immobility of a knee – $22,500; hearing loss – from $360 – $4,500 (and no, $360 is not a typo) and infertility – $4,500. The maximum for a worker who is totally disabled (e.g. paralysis of at least two limbs, profound brain injury, loss of both hands) is about $90,000.

5. Medical Panels. The decision of a Medical Panel is considered final and not subject to any form of appeal. This is a denial of natural justice. For example, new information could show that the Medical Panel erred. Therefore decisions rendered by Medical Panels should be subject to appeal.

6. Pre-existing conditions: The WCB declares that normal aging constitutes a “pre-existing condition” – a blatant form of age discrimination. Even when a worker has not previously been diagnosed or treated by a physician for this “condition”, and was able to perform their job before the injury but can no longer do so, WCB declares a “pre-existing condition.” WCB then limits benefits to a period of recovery from an “exacerbation of the pre-existing condition.” WCB should recognize a pre-existing disability or impairment, not a pre-existing condition.

7. The Fair Practices Office must include a consultative role for injured workers through their organizations.

We trust that you will consider these proposals, which have the support of the many Albertans who have signed out petition.

Yours sincerely,

Donna Oberik

Executive Director

Canadian Injured Workers Association of Alberta

  10 Responses to “Canadian Injured Workers Association of Alberta Response to the Final Report of the Alberta Workers Compensation Board Review Panel”

  1. I am an injured worker. I was exposed to a very high concentration of deadly poisonous H2S gas in an accident at a sour gas plant. That happened in April 1988. My claim was finally accepted by a decision of the Appeals Commission in December 2015.The WCB has provided no treatment, no rehabilitation and has rejected my every request for treatment for my brain injury. Every request is refused with the message that i can appeal to the DRDRB. They always refuse too. They are very creative in their reasoning. Their doctors originally said that exposure to 18% sour gas was “minor”, and i could not possibly have any injuries. Later, they flip-flopped and said that yes, the eposure was very significant and i should be dead, and since i am not dead i must be ok. Even though their own Millard Centre did a functional assessment and declared me unemployable, they still insist that i could work at a desk job for 20 hours a week. When i set something down, i need help to find it, even if it is right in front of me. I have been unable to sleep since the accident and suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and chronic pain. I cannot stand on one foot or walk in a straight line. I have urinary tract dysfunction and need to use a catheter. I often lose my train of thought mid-sentence. I cannot remember what i just said. I cannot remember what i am trying to do, etc. Thirty years and counting.

  2. dont be afraid to call them up {case managers}and defend your disability ,dont get scared by their hallow words and scare tactics,i have been dealing with these animals for 6 years ,i catch them in a lie ,i call them ,i catch them writing a lie i call them ,they are biased, fraudulent mafia style company ,get after them ,i have gotten after them in the past 6 years on every point ,every paper,document ,diagnosis ,every written statement ,everything ,please like myself try to go to any media open to you in your city .please do ,bring this criminal organization fraudulent activities to light with the media ,nothing else seems to work

  3. media is the answer and only media ,i been fucked by work unsafe bc for the last 6 years ,chef by trade and education,complex regional pain syndrome in my right hand spreading to my left foot ,10 hours of crippling pain a day with 3 hours sleep at night ,they offered security and sale job ,to me with only use of one hand and help of a cane to walk ,fucking a joke ,media is the ONLY ,ONLY ANSWER

  4. I a.m a litigant againts Wcb and The Appeal Commision . My husband died 5 Years Ago. I appealed many Times and I attended hearing . The Final decision was bias and unjust . I ask The Court To strike down thier Jurisdiction and strike down The First Amendment . That I have a question of Law . The Judge order a Statu Of Virtue To The defendant .

  5. Bill 30 falls short on injured workers human rights.

  6. Stop Deeming Completely. Offer proper Jobs for Injuries so people can return to work with the proper training for those jobs… NOT LEVEL ONE COMPUTER COURSE ON HOW TO TURN ONE ON !!!!

    STOP unfair plateaus and make LOSS of EARNINGS AWARDS so they dont date back to UNFAIR PLATEAU dates.

    Make WCB pay for lawyers when injured workers win so to stop unfair decisions that need appeal after appeal after appeal after appeal. Make them accountable so the decisions are fair for the worker !!!!!

  7. One significant missing piece of this review is accountability. Today the Act says the Minister is responsible. Yet she denies any responsibility.
    A second missing piece is the ability of law enforcement to investigate or human rights to pursue without a minimum 6 months having passed since your claim was closed.
    Seems like the entire “review” was designed to say – look….shiny…and forget all about the past.
    $2.5m and they never even spoke to the Office of the Appeals Adviser.

  8. WCB/WSIB is a BIAS System run by Government. It is not a Separate Entity.

    The System Benefits Government, WCB Employees, Employers, Lawyers and LEAST OFF ALL INJURED WORKERS.

    What was once the Meredith Principles which WCB was based on; are now tales of “Animal Farm”.

  9. I was making 14 000 a month when i crushed my spine working on the rigs, wcb offered me 16 000 a YEAR and joke jobs to earn it

  10. Time to revamp the WCB system and to make if fair for workers often permanently injured. WCB is meant to protect and support those injured performing their jobs.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>